Federal Anti-Gay Amendment Returns In Wake Of Calif. Ruling »
Posted by: david_nwpa 2 months, 2 weeks ago8 CommentsReflectReport this Story
Republican Congressman Paul Broun has announced plans to reintroduce an amendment to the US Constitution to bar same-sex marriage. Broun (R-Ga) said the California Supreme Court ruling recognizing same-sex marriage has made it an imperative to reign in what he called "activist judges".
Read Full Story at 365gay.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 8
-

Will13132 months, 2 weeks ago
What business is it that a congressman from Georgia is conserned about what the people in California do....
I thought Republicans are all for STATES RIGHTS.. yet they are always the ones that want to amend the federal constitution....
Reply -

Will13132 months, 2 weeks ago
"There simply is no basis for the suggestion that homosexual 'marriage' is a right protected by the United States Constitution," Broun said.
----
there simply is no basis that ANY marriage is a "right" protected by the United States Constituton..
Reply -

david_nwpa2 months, 2 weeks ago
I agree. Marriage rights in general are left to the states vis a vis the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution. While on the subject, if gay marriages are not protected and using Will's logic, no marriages are protected, then the government should not give married couples the option of filing jointly and thereby decreasing their tax burden.
Reply-

Will13132 months, 2 weeks ago
I just DON'T SEE the word MARRIAGE in the constitution or any of the bill of rights or amendments....
no matter HOW one defines marriage.....
my thoughts as a hetrosexual married male....
I thank gays should have the same right to be miserable as the rest of us... sarcasm.. off
seriously.. I want someone to explain to me how ANYONE else getting married takes away from MY MARRIAGE...
Reply-

Mdiar2 months, 2 weeks ago
"seriously.. I want someone to explain to me how ANYONE else getting married takes away from MY MARRIAGE..."
Why... because... uhhhh... look, over there! *Quickly run in other direction*
You'll never catch me now! Muahahahahah!!!
You'll never find someone able to explain it Will. Never. I argued with my own mother on this and I even got her to admit that a theological perspective can exist that completely accept same sex marriage and no legal argument truly exists for not validating same sex marriage! Of course she is rather liberal in many respects... her job demands it.
Reply
-
-
-

Hobe2 months, 2 weeks ago
Federal Anti-Gay Amendment Returns In Wake Of Calif. Ruling
What is the problem? If a Woman Abortionist want's to Kill her Baby it is her choice it's the Law. It may Not be Humane, but, it's legal. Likewise, if a HoMosexual man or a HoMosexual woman wants to Marry a same sex gender it is their respective Choice.
HoMOsexuals should and Must have the same rights as all americans.
Reply
Submitted By:
david_nwpaHello folks, First, allow me to thank you all for your kind words, thoughts, prayers, and concerns. I am meeting with my Ear, Nose and ...
Also submitted:
- 1.0 - Detroit mayor ordered jailed
- 1.0 - Archbishop's letters contradict current gay position
- 1.0 - Besen: Why I'm proud to be a liberal
- 4.9 - Crist voices support for anti-gay Fla. amendment | 365 Gay News
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Also Propping This Article
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?




